Mark Peugeot
Network One
>
>
> > We recently decided to try the PacWest Co-location service in
> > Oakland using our PM3's and their Telco service. We have two
> > Pm3's running ComOS 3.8b15 connected to them via 4 CT1
> > lines. The encoding is AMI, framing D4, PCM: u-law, signaling
> > E&M winkstart. All works fine for 3 modems on each PM, then
> > we (our customers) get fast busy. PacWest says the portmasters
> > aren't winking back after three connections so the lines
> > are busied out, I say fast busy's would point to the telco. In
> > any case, they claim it's the equipment, I suspect it's them,
> > my customers don't care who's fault it is, they just want it to
> > work. Has anyone else seen this? Does anyone have a clue
> > or experience with PacWest and Portmasters?
> >
>
> Why would you want to be using AMI, D4?? This means either your circuit is
> lineside CT1 or your configuration is incorrect. In my experience most AMI, D4
> circuits use an FXS signaling. If this is in fact a trunkside circuit you better
> check the line specs with PacWest. What kind of switch is this on????
> Jon Clemons
> -
> To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
> 'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
> Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>
>
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>