I just downgraded to 3.5.1b7, and I get the same situation (goes to
busy).. with this error message.:
portmaster> S10: Sending Request Connect - 56Kbps / Voice (B1 ID:2)
S10: Received Disconnect Ack Temporary Failure
S10: Received Call Clear - Call-id 2 invalid
I wonder what the deal is.
Again the string for the bitsurfr I'm using is:
AT&F&C1&D2%A2=95%A4=1%A98=S@B0=2
Drew
>
> First I'd check to make sure that the phone company has setup hunting
> properly. This is a big PITA for BA/Nynex.
>
> If that doesnt work, I'd set con, then set deb isdn on
> and see if the portmaster is acknowledging the call. If something comes up
> on the portmaster, but the user still gets a busy, I'd call support. We
> had just the opposite happen. We'd get ring-no-answer (and the port said
> IDLE, not NO-SERVICE), so we downgraded to ComOS 3.5 and it took care of
> it.
>
> >
> > I'm getting a busy signal when I call either of the 2 channels that I have
> > connected to my 5 BRI card.
> > The line is provisioned for both data and voice, however, instead of a
> > ring, I get busy.
> > Is there something I have to configure?
> >
> > Drew
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
> > 'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
> > Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>
> >
>
>
> --
> /*
> Jason Philbrook | Midcoast Internet Solutions
> jp@midcoast.com | Internet Access, LAN, WAN, and Linux
> www.midcoast.com/jp/ | Service and Consulting for Midcoast Maine
> */
>
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>