On Fri, Feb 20, 1998 at 11:13:33PM -0500, Christopher Masto wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 1998 at 05:31:09PM -0800, Kevin A. Smith wrote:
> > >My point was this: some routers don't require the server to do anything
> > >special. Some routers have brains and can figure out to add drop channels
> > >on their own. Ascend's can't. For those of using LE, Ascend simply
> > >doesn't work *now*, and therefore has been entirely dropped from my
> > >acceptable hardware list.
> >
> > Which Lucent must think is a bad thing since they *are* adding BACP support.
> > Why else would they?
>
> It certainly _should_ be a goal to provide work-arounds for their
> competitors' deficiencies.
> --
> Christopher Masto <chris@netmonger.net>
> Director of Operations, NetMonger Communications, Inc.
> +1-516-221-6664 http://www.netmonger.net/ info@netmonger.net
> -
> To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
> 'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
> Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>
-- - Steve - Systems Manager - Community Internet Access, Inc. - Gallup and Grants, New Mexico - To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with 'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message. Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>