> >My point was this: some routers don't require the server to do anything
> >special. Some routers have brains and can figure out to add drop channels
> >on their own. Ascend's can't. For those of using LE, Ascend simply
> >doesn't work *now*, and therefore has been entirely dropped from my
> >acceptable hardware list.
> >
> >Jon
> Fine and dandy but now ive got 10 of the p50's sitting around....
> and my only option is to nail both channels up.
Hrm, this isnt right, as of com os with bacp. Granted I havent
implemented it yet, but I was told that even p25's and p50's could NOW
dynamically bring up and drop 2nd channels. I know of one other ISP in
town doing it.
Are you saying youve tried it? Are you using a 3.7 kernel with BACP
compiled in or a 3.8 beta? (I guess you arent supposed to say, even if you
are).
~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~
Jake Messinger ph:713-772-6690 Livingston Var
AMS, Inc. fx:713-774-3498 Medical Billing
8300 Bissonnet #400 jake@ams.com Internet Services
Houston, Texas 77074 www.ams.com/~jake Business Management
~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>