Re: (PM) ascend 2 b channel on demand

Kevin A. Smith (kevin@ascend.com)
Fri, 20 Feb 1998 17:31:09 -0800

At 01:46 PM 2/20/98 -0800, Jon Rust wrote:
>
>My bad. I thought the options for min/max/base disappeared once BACP was
>selected, thus leaving MP+ as the only rubber-bandwidth option. I stand
>corrected.

No problem. I just like people to see my name on the RFCs :-)

>My point was this: some routers don't require the server to do anything
>special. Some routers have brains and can figure out to add drop channels
>on their own. Ascend's can't. For those of using LE, Ascend simply
>doesn't work *now*, and therefore has been entirely dropped from my
>acceptable hardware list.

Which Lucent must think is a bad thing since they *are* adding BACP support.
Why else would they?

Kevin

-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>