Re: (PM) OSPF Question ...

Juergen Unger (j.unger@choin.net)
Mon, 9 Feb 1998 09:27:25 +0100

Hi !

you don't get the point ... I've talked about routes which are
_not_ active but needed because there are dial-out locations.
If these routes are not announced, IP packets from the outside
would never reach the system and an dial-out location would
never be used.

bye,
-Juergen-Unger-

On Sun, Feb 08, 1998 at 03:22:25PM -0700, Stephen Fisher wrote:
> The Portmaster will announce those when they are needed - active.
>
> On Sun, Feb 08, 1998 at 10:56:59PM +0100, Juergen Unger wrote:
> > I've tested OSPF routing from our Portmasters to one of our Ciscos. Works
> > fine. But one point I am missing: Is it right that the Portmaster only
> > announces routes that are allready pointing to an active network
> > interface? What about routes pointing to 'unknown' ? I would like to have
> > them announced too because they are necessary for customers who get an
> > dialout from us.

-- 
CHOIN! HCT GmbH -- http://www.choin.net
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.