- PRI gives you 64k data channels
(CT1 gives you 56k data channels)
- PRI allows full B channel ISDN (64k B channels)
- PRI often lets you dial in and out
- PRI lines can be much more easily debugged since they have a dedicated
data channel ("D" channel) for call completition and tear down.
- The PM3 supports Calling-Line-Id and Called-Line-Id (caller id things) on
PRI's and not on CT1's "yet"
- I believe PRI's always offer caller id, whereas it is harder and sometimes
impossible and more costly to get your telco to give it to you on CT1's
There's probably more reasons I can't think of right now :)
On Tue, Jan 27, 1998 at 02:07:21PM -0700, Chris Phillips wrote:
> If you had to choose between using PRI or CT1, and cost was not an issue,
> which would you go with and why? I am trying to settle a religious debate
> here. ;')
-- - Steve - Systems Manager - Community Internet Access, Inc. - Gallup and Grants, New Mexico - To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with 'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.