(PM) set pool 32 with OSPF?
Jason Hatch (zone@berkshire.net)
Tue, 27 Jan 1998 05:38:24 -0500 (EST)
I just wanted to verify something that I was reading in the archives. For
the purposes of route table reduction, is it OK to set pool 32 on a
portmaster if your address pool begins on a boundary of a /27 subnet (and
it is neither the first or the last subnet) in order to get it to pass one
/27 route for each portmaster instead of host routes or combinations of
routes, ie:
a.b.c.32 /27
instead of:
(assuming a set assigned 31)
a.b.c.31/32
a.b.c.32/28
a.b.c.48/29
a.b.c.56/30
a.b.c.60/32
Even though the PM has only 30 ports, it should just cycle through the 32
addresses safely, right?
-Jason
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.