On Mon, Jan 26, 1998 at 09:41:27AM -0600, Brian Elfert wrote:
>
>
> On 26 Jan 1998, Chris Adams wrote:
>
> > A filter on the port with the default route can be used to capture
> > these, but then the packets just die. Shouldn't the PM instead return a
> > host unreachable (or maybe network unreachable) packet? If ComOS had a
> > null interface (bit bucket) and had a default route to null with a high
> > metric for advertised addresses, this wouldn't be a problem.
>
> This feature was high on Livingston's to-do list 6 or 9 months ago. I'm
> not sure what happened since then.
>
> Maybe we need to send in a few more RFEs.
>
> Brian
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
> 'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
-- - Steve - Systems Manager - Community Internet Access, Inc. - Gallup and Grants, New Mexico - To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with 'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.