Fw: (PM) BGP4 & IRX114 (and a couple of questions)
Mark Johnson (portmaster-users@gemsoft.net)
Sat, 17 Jan 1998 18:26:29 -0000
> > But a PM-3 will handle that with 32MB.
> >
> > >PM3 with 32Mb would be OK but the basic BGP options could cause
> > problems.
> >
> > What kind of problems do you mean?
> >
Well the adding of an AS path is the major one. There are lots of advanced
BGP commands in the Cisco that the Livingston just doesn't have. Route
dampening is another major one that springs to mind. I don't know much
about Cisco's, I just know the BGP4 on Livingston is simple in comparison.
There are almost certainly lots of other features missing that I wouldn't
know I needed until it was too late.
After having said all that I do like the PM3 and would love to use it.
Mark Johnson
MJohnson@gemsoft.net
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.