Re: (PM) IP UnNum over FrameRelay

Stephen Fisher (lithium@cia-g.com)
Thu, 8 Jan 1998 21:59:26 -0700

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: MegaZone: "(PM) PM3 DSP ADMIN state (fwd)"
Previous message: MegaZone: "(PM) Caller ID and CT1 (fwd)"
In reply to: Mia's Virtual Post Office: "Re: (PM) Winnuke?!"
Next in thread: John Lange: "Re: (PM) Winnuke?!"

Ciscos don't do it either. I believe the reason is because FR can, and
often is, meshed (more than one destination possible when going out each
physical port).

On Thu, Jan 08, 1998 at 06:30:21PM -0500, Mike Pistone wrote:

> What is the reason for not allowing IP Unnumbered over FR on Livingston
> Routers?

-- 
 - Steve
  - Systems Manager
  - Community Internet Access, Inc.
  - Gallup and Grants, New Mexico
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.

Next message: MegaZone: "(PM) PM3 DSP ADMIN state (fwd)"
Previous message: MegaZone: "(PM) Caller ID and CT1 (fwd)"
In reply to: Mia's Virtual Post Office: "Re: (PM) Winnuke?!"
Next in thread: John Lange: "Re: (PM) Winnuke?!"