On Sat, 29 Nov 1997, Tim Patterson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Currently, I serve a number of frame connected pops
> via a cisco 2501 to pm2er-30's or Ascend 40xx's. I am planning to add
> a new 4048 to one of pops that already has an pm2er-30.
>
> Internet wholesaler--->@harborside cisco 2501--->Frame Cloud--->
> POP(in small town-2) (PM2er-30..New 4048)--->Dialups
>
> Routing Question : Assuming the 4048 and PM2er-30 are on the same wire in
> the remote POP and using one PVC, should I treat the 4048 like a second
> PM2e slave, or switch and let the 4048 do the routing and slave the
> pm2er-30? At present, most of the routing is static with .224 netmasks.
>
> The dial tone answer-rollover issues appear to be resolved.
>
> Opinions please? Aside from the obvious, buy a pm3 :)
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> Tim Patterson
> @harborside
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
> 'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
>
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.