Re: (PM) SLC's, PM-3's, and GTE

John W Baxter (jwblist@olympus.net)
Tue, 18 Nov 1997 17:20:34 -0800

At 16:43 -0600 11/18/97, Jacob Suter wrote:
>Personally I see 5-10 years in the future this switched-resource s...
>being tossed to the dogs and nice all digital shared resource networks
>put into place to handle most all telecommunications... The existing
>network is just plain flat outdated compared to technology out today.

The existing network at any time is always outmoded (and if it weren't,
everything would cost more).

When manual operator, hand-crank systems were possible, *most* people had
to send young Jimmy off to Aunt Bessie's to invite her to dinner.

In about 1955, we stopped at a new Chevron station (just) inside the Los
Angeles city limits coming down from the grapevine on what was to become
I-5. The station sported a new glass-and-aluminum phone booth, inside was
a new pay phone instrument: with its shiny new hand crank and
instructions. It was several years after that that the last hand-keyed
railroad telegraphy station in North America was shut down.

In 1971 when I lived in Ann Arbor, half the phones in town were
NOrmandy-6xyyy, where x was not 6.
The switch which did that was a 5-level step-by-step switch (with tone
translator, whose pulse output was audible if you strained), which had been
THE Ann Arbor switch, providing 5 digit local service. Calling between
numbers in NO-6 (666), you could dial 1 or more leading 6s, then the last
four. [I never found a "too many 6s" threshold, but I stopped at about
20.] After seeing a 6, it effectively said "ah, that's me" and tossed out
6s until it saw something else.

--John

--
John Baxter (Born before ENIAC, but not by much.)
   jwblist@olympus.net      Port Ludlow, WA, USA

- To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with 'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.