Re: (PM) OR-U: no default route to learned IP address?

Stephen Zedalis (tintype@exis.net)
Fri, 7 Nov 1997 15:26:23 -0500 (EST)

On Fri, 7 Nov 1997, Tom wrote:

>
>On Fri, 7 Nov 1997, Stephen Zedalis wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 7 Nov 1997, John Kelly wrote:
>>
>> >I was considering an OR-U until I read this. Someone else posted
>> >on the list how some competitive routers were brain dead, but this
>> >limitation seems brain dead to me.
>>
>> Why not just have RIP or OSPF (Livingston, unlike Ascend's Pipelines
>> understands OSPF) pass a default route to the connection? I wouldn't want
>
> No, the OR-U doesn't understand OSPF either. I find it amusing that you
>suggest this, as this is well known limitation.

Hmmm, I've got 4 of em talking OSPF just fine with ALL my internal
routes, MD5 passwords, the works, what pray tell do ya mean?

-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.