>Because you said "Livingston does not officially recommend Stac on 128k."
>I didnt understand what the "officially" meant and why, if it is not
>official, is it in a current COM OS release?
Hmmm, I read the message a little differently... I got it as they did
not recommend Stac at bandwidth "exceeding" 128K due to CPU load. This
would be a particularly wise disclaimer to make based on their lack of
implementation/testing on the OR-HS (128K works great on ISDN and the
OR-U) and the fact that "some", will despite warnings... try it at higher
speeds on the OR-HS, when it is in-fact actually available on that
platform.
>Its not a big deal, MZ, I just wasnt sure what you were getting at.