And Livingston isn't saying anything other than "it's being worked on"
well we only have 21 days to return the old cards so we need it fixed
like, now.
- Steve
- Systems Manager
- Community Internet Access, Inc.
- Gallup and Grants, New Mexico
On Fri, 29 Aug 1997, Chris Evoy wrote:
> We downgraded all our units and are waiting for a comos revision before we
> try implementing the 56k cards/3.7 comos again. I would like to add to this
> thread that the pm3's running old cards and 3.5c6 is *ROCK SOLID* and we
> are *very* happy with them. It is just that the implementation of the 56k
> and/or 3.7 is not ready for prime time. I am patient and will wait till the
> bugs to be ironed out before making any final judgements. Anyone know when
> the new comos update will be out to fix the usr 33.6 and other dropping
> connection problems? Livingston? It would be nice if LE would keep the list
> informed with status reports, etc. instead of ignoring the obvious swelling
> of discontent among PM owners.
>
> Enough said,
>
> Chris Evoy
> HyperNet
> cevoy@lonet.ca
> http://www.lonet.ca
>
>
> ----------
> > From: Jake Messinger <jake@ams.com>
> > To: portmaster-users@livingston.com
> > Subject: Is anyone happy with the 56k cards?
> > Date: Friday, August 29, 1997 10:26 AM
> >
> > I'm seeing enough email on the list to concern me about the performance
> of
> > the PM 3.
> >
> > I would like to know, out of those of you who have the pm 3's with the
> 56k
> > cards:
> >
> > Are you happy with them?
> > Are they working okay?
> > Are they faster than the old cards?
> > Are they slower?
> > For those who replaced pm 2's with pm 3's+56k, where are you on the
> > functionality scale? Are you customers getting worse service? The same
> > service, or BETTER service?
> >
> > I ask this for a few reasons:
> >
> > 1. I have a customer who is quite unhappy with the performance of the pm
> > 3 with the 56k cards. He says he is LOOSING customers because of it.
> > He wants to go back to pm 2e's.
> >
> > 2. I need to make a decision as to whether the PM 3 is something I want
> to
> > continue to use, sell and support
> >
> > 3. Livingston, as you may know, has filed with the SEC to sell stocks. I
> > just printed the 108 page filing. I want to make a recommendation as to
> > whether to invest in the company or not and the performance of the PM 3
> is
> > critical to that recommendation.
> >
> >
> ~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~
> > Jake Messinger 713-772-6690 jake@ams.com
> > Advanced Medical Systems, Inc. jake@uh.edu
> > 8300 Bissonnet #400
> > Houston, Texas 77074 http://www.ams.com/~jake
> >
> ~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~
>