Re: Stupid Question

Stephen Fisher (lithium@cia-g.com)
Tue, 19 Aug 1997 22:17:47 -0600 (MDT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Stephen Fisher: "Re: 56k Modems"
Previous message: MegaZone: "Re: Radius entry (fwd)"
In reply to: abla: "Stupid Question"

Livingston wouldn't have had to even upgrade the hardware but they were at
the same time changing to Lucent's modem code instead of their home-grown
modem code. Lucent's code has to run on Lucent DSPs unless Livingston
wants to waste a LOT of time porting it every time Lucent changes
something. It's easiest to just put Lucent chips in the PM3's.

On Tue, 19 Aug 1997, abla wrote:

> Just out of curiousity.. what is different in the new modems.. i thought
> being digital (dsp driven) modems the bios/etc would be completly
> software upgradable why the need for new modems? 56k code larger than
> expected so had to use dsp's w/ larger nvram?

Next message: Stephen Fisher: "Re: 56k Modems"
Previous message: MegaZone: "Re: Radius entry (fwd)"
In reply to: abla: "Stupid Question"