Re: X.75 vs. V.120

Heiko Schlittermann (heiko@os.inf.tu-dresden.de)
Tue, 19 Aug 1997 14:33:26 +0200

--P54qlpMx3WjD+/8w
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Tue, Aug 19, 1997 at 02:18:54PM +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote:
: On Tue, 19 Aug 1997, Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
:
: Nope ... i already inserted request for X.75 some weeks ago, as X.75 and
: V.120 are compareable from type of service (Not protocol) but X.75 is more
: popular in Europe than V.120 (Which is mostly used in the US).
:
: >Don't know Engineering's plans, but this sounds good, especially if more
: >popular than V.110/V.120. I'll forward this feature request over to be
: >added to the request-for-enhancement list for future consideration by
: >Eng-ineering.

Ok, so I'd like to request X.75 too, just for the records, and to
document a demand for X.75.

(BTW: Are there other PRI products out there supporting X.75?
Or shouldn't this be asked here?)

Heiko

--
email : heiko@lotte.sax.de heiko@debian.org heiko@sax.de
pgp   : A1 7D F6 7B 69 73 48 35  E1 DE 21 A7 A8 9A 77 92 
finger: heiko@sax.sax.de         heiko@master.debian.org
voice : +49-351-4638321                  +49-172-7909055 

--P54qlpMx3WjD+/8w Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3ia

iQCVAwUBM/mSldBsuuHx3GhhAQHjtwP+IjsyAGOFbMnJxx3+crrtikkiT8n3PLUg TIieKAEKPbL3/y0nf32CFNtm836q6XtWyHVIA/iBtLs/OORbMZ6QsECYzasuGtyE fVq0g1XQUuksw4Mbbad77DbFZ+vcUG0jCuhE1Xd0CIPZVCSeDKpK2wwnJLu6Uh2e HHbAEYJIen4= =V0G2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--P54qlpMx3WjD+/8w--