Re: X.75 vs. V.120

Florian Lohoff (flo@mini.gt.owl.de)
Tue, 19 Aug 1997 14:18:54 +0200 (MET DST)

This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text,
while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.
Send mail to mime@docserver.cac.washington.edu for more info.

--8hSSmFeDONvqYzh+
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=us-ascii
Content-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.970819141425.32182C@mini.gt.owl.de>

On Tue, 19 Aug 1997, Heiko Schlittermann wrote:

> Now I don't know if I've to convince the ISDN card + driver to use V.120
> or if I can have the PM to handle X.75 (the preferred way).
>
> Or do I intermix completly unrelated things?

Nope ... i already inserted request for X.75 some weeks ago, as X.75 and
V.120 are compareable from type of service (Not protocol) but X.75 is more
popular in Europe than V.120 (Which is mostly used in the US).

[ ... quote of thread ... ]

>> V.120 is used for 'login'-service, not 'network'. For login
>> connections (telnet, rlogin, portmux) a async emulation is necessary.
>> V.120 (and the terrible V.110) is one possible solution - but far more
>> ISDN-adapters use X.75 for that purpose.
>> So I also hope that one day the PM3 will accept X.75 in addition to
>> V.110/120.>>
>
>Don't know Engineering's plans, but this sounds good, especially if more
>popular than V.110/V.120. I'll forward this feature request over to be
>added to the request-for-enhancement list for future consideration by
>Eng-ineering.
>
>>
>> Martin.
>> --
>>
>>
>
>Thanks for your valuable input.
>
>Best regards,
>
>Theo Van Dyne Livingston Enterprises Inc. Phone:011-1-510-737-2100
>Support Engineer 4464 Willow Road Fax:011-1-510-737-2110
>support@livingston.com Pleasanton, CA 94588 USAhttp://www.livingston.com

[ ... ]

Flo

--
Florian Lohoff     mailto:flo@mini.gt.owl.de      Phone:+49-5241-470566
Privates Internet Ostwestfalen-Lippe, Guetersloh - http://www.gt.owl.de

--8hSSmFeDONvqYzh+--