> On Thu, 14 Aug 1997, David Denney wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 13 Aug 1997, Sherwood Portmaster-List wrote:
> >
> > > and the rest of the list... it's been noted that you should _NOT_ cc:
> > > support@livingston.com send it separately so they don't sh^tcan it...
> >
> > <explitive deleted> THAT! Why would a CC: to support (which __IS__
> listed in docs
> > as an offical support channel!) throw anything away? I will not send
> > the report again, and I do expect a response.
>
> I dont think the first statement was correct. I have CC:d stuff to support
> that I sent to the list and gotten an email from livingston support
> answering the question. "WHO" noted that? Was that a directive from
> Livingston or MZ? or just a suggestion?
I was kindly told, after having suggested before to cc: support that since
it goes to the list they generally ignore it... I believe it was MZ who
had noted that they generally don't want to bother with possible
cross-answerings or something to that effect.
> BTW, I did NOT cc to support for this.
8) me either?
-- Aloha from Paradise,Sherwood