I'm not sure what this exactly means. I am basing the bitsurfur's
problems on this scenario:
I ftp FROM my gateway to our shell machine.
I do an ftp get on a file. I get 6k to 7k using one B channel.
I do an ftp get on the same file. I get 6k to 7k using TWO B channels.
The two of us did the debug together and remember, we didn't see any
problems with the bitsurfr connecting to the pm2ei.
Doing a SEND from my gateway into our shell machine gives me 15k
using 1 or 2 B channels.
So, my plea for help is still open.
Does anyone have any magical init strings for the Bitsurfr? Has anyone
else seen the scenario below and above concerning getting the same
throughput whether on one B channel or two B channels?
The same exact setup with a 3com T/A works properly.
Thanks,
Joe
On Wed, 13 Aug 1997, Jon Lewis wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Aug 1997, Joe wrote:
>
> > Have a bitsurfr pro on a linux machine dialing into a pm2ei.
>
> My Bitsurfer pro :(
>
> > Whether it uses 1 or 2 B channels, throughput is the same. On the same
> > portmaster and linux machine, a 3com Impact works perfectly.
>
> Weren't you getting 7kb/s in one direction today and 15kb/s in the other?
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> Jon Lewis <jlewis@fdt.net> | Unsolicited commercial e-mail will
> Network Administrator | be proof-read for $199/message.
> Florida Digital Turnpike |
> ______http://inorganic5.fdt.net/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key____
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Joseph Barnhart <flaboy@gnv.fdt.net> | HellSouth Communications
Technician, FDT.NET | flaboy@hellsouth.com
http://ns.hellsouth.com | irc@irc.aohell.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------