But if any1 has any ideas about my other (side) question still.
That'd be great.
On Thu, 7 Aug 1997, Leonard wrote:
> Hi, I was looking at a successful PPP negotiation and noticed that
> the PM3 rejected the secondary DNS. We have the dialup user set
> both primary and secondary DNS at DUN, and the PM3 is set to use
> DNS with nameserver x.x.x.1
> I would guess that since the PM3 has no secondary DNS set, it rejected
> the users' secondary DNS setting. Is there anyway to get it to
> either set a secondary DNS at PM3; or not reject the secondary DNS
> from the user?
>
> As a side question, isn't it part of PPP negotiations for the PM3 to
> tell the users' DUN what it's DNSes are (ie. don't set DNS in DUN at all)?
> We tried that a while back, but about half our users would not be able to
> obtain the DNS ips.
>
> Here's the 0x51 dump:
>
> Received IPCP_CONFIGURE_REQUEST on port S11 of 36 bytes containing:
> 01 01 00 28 02 06 00 2D 0F 01 03 06 00 00 00 00 81 06 01
> 02 03 01 82 06 00 00 00 00 83 06 01 02 03 02 84 06 00
> 00 00 00
> Packet Info: Code: 01, ID: 01, 40 bytes.
> IP-Compression-Protocol [0x02], length: (6 bytes), Van Jacobson
> Compressed TCP/IP [0x002D0F01]
> IP-Address [0x03], length: (6 bytes), [0.0.0.0]
> Primary DNS Server Address [0x81], length: (6 bytes), [x.x.x.1]
> Primary NBNS Server Address [0x82], length: (6 bytes), [0.0.0.0]
> Secondary DNS Server Address [0x83], length: (6 bytes), [1.2.3.2]
> Secondary NBNS Server Address [0x84], length: (6 bytes),[0.0.0.0]
>
> Sending IPCP_CONFIGURE_REJECT to port S11 of 22 bytes containing:
> 04 01 00 16 82 06 00 00 00 00 83 06 01 02 03 02 84 06 00
> 00 00 00
> Packet Info: Code: 04, ID: 01, 22 bytes.
> Primary NBNS Server Address [0x82], length: (6 bytes), [0.0.0.0]
> Secondary DNS Server Address [0x83], length: (6 bytes), [x.x.x.2]
> Secondary NBNS Server Address [0x84], length: (6 bytes),[0.0.0.0]
>
> Any ideas?
> thanks in advance.
> Leonard.
>
>
>