> I'd be willing to bet that they are using Microsoft's MLPPP ala WinNT
> or Win95 and not Livingston's proprietary method. Or they are using
> two PM's. Jake, you and I have been on the list for a long time and
> noone has mentioned the ability to do EQL on anything other than
> Livingston products and/or Linux.
I know, but Im TRYING to fish out the 2 folks that responded to me NOT on
the list (but they were on the list) who told me that they knew people who
had taken the EQL code and ported it. I lost that email. It went something
like...
Jake: How are they doing EQL with NT?
OTHER GUY: Probably the same way we are doing it and that is with ported
Linux EQL code.
If it can be done, then it would eliminate the need for PM's at both ends
and it would solve the no mlppp on analog problem.
If I had the time, then I would do it. Id have to spend quite some time
just researching the Winblows tcp crap tho. Its just a lot easier to throw
in a PM 11 at the remote end.
~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~
Jake Messinger 713-772-6690 jake@ams.com
Advanced Medical Systems, Inc. jake@uh.edu
8300 Bissonnet #400
Houston, Texas 77074 http://www.ams.com/~jake
~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~