Re: Design scenario question....

Jake Messinger (jake@ams.com)
Wed, 30 Jul 1997 17:36:37 -0500 (CDT)

On Wed, 30 Jul 1997, Timothy Deem wrote:

> 1) 2 cisco 2501 routers with a single synch 56k DDS
> circuit between them.
>
>
> 2) A livingston OR-U office ISDN router connected to
> a livingston PM2 Access Server with a dual asynch
> ISDN (128k) between them.

Scenario 2 is easy to set up and will be more than twice as fast
as a sync 56k circuit.

> Cost is not the specific issue -- design for support of
> the end users is the primary focus in this application.

They are easy to support. I have started to set up OR-U's in remote
offices as they can be setup with the same pm console I use for the PM
servers.

Now if they just added 3 things:

1. WALL MOUNTABILITY
2. POT(s) (in the worx but prolly far away)
3. STAC compression (in the worx and close)

Id be HAPPY HAPPY.

~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~
Jake Messinger 713-772-6690 jake@ams.com
Advanced Medical Systems, Inc. jake@uh.edu
8300 Bissonnet #400
Houston, Texas 77074 http://www.ams.com/~jake
~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~