> On Thu, 24 Jul 1997 patrick@namesecure.com wrote:
>
> >I think you are talking about Livingston's implementation of BGP. Cisco
> >has iBGP specifically designed for use as an IGP.
>
> Not so. iBGP is solely for distributing routing information among several
> border routers that speak eBGP. It is not meant as an IGP.
Bah, I seemed to remember someone running iBGP as an IGP.... My mistake...
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
Patrick Greenwell (800) 299-1288
Systems Administrator
Namesecure
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/