Re: NAT (fwd)

Chris Gauthier (chris@kinderfeld.icenter.net)
Wed, 23 Jul 1997 09:40:58 -0500 (CDT)

On Sat, 19 Jul 1997, MegaZone wrote:

> This came up just a couple of weeks ago...
>
> Yes, we are already well along in developing NAT. I believe the current plan
> is for straight NAT (many-to-many translation) first, with Proxy-NAT
> (one-to-many) following.
>

Very Good! This should allow us livingston users to put off quite a few
ipv4 headaches.

/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/
Chris Gauthier - Administration, Development chris@icenter.net
IC Enternet - Winnipeg's Premier ISP (204)958-9400 V o i c e
17 St. Mary's Rd. - Winnipeg, MB, R2H 1H2 (204)958-9411 F a x

-- If you think the problem is complicated now, just wait until we've got
it solved.
/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/