Also does anyone know what these errors are from my Cisco(Yes I know its
not the cisco mailing list but since we are talking about this stuff)
Jul 16 09:54:13 cisco1 169: %LANCE-5-COLL: Unit 0, excessive collisions. TDR=2
Jul 16 09:54:58 cisco1 170: %LANCE-5-COLL: Unit 0, excessive collisions. TDR=0
Jul 16 10:01:16 cisco1 171: %LANCE-5-COLL: Unit 0, excessive collisions. TDR=1
Jul 16 10:01:18 cisco1 172: %LANCE-5-COLL: Unit 0, excessive collisions. TDR=2
Jul 16 10:01:44 cisco1 173: %LANCE-5-COLL: Unit 0, excessive collisions. TDR=1
Jul 16 10:02:10 cisco1 174: %LANCE-5-COLL: Unit 0, excessive collisions. TDR=3
Jul 16 10:02:16 cisco1 175: %LANCE-5-COLL: Unit 0, excessive collisions. TDR=1
Jul 16 10:02:22 cisco1 176: %LANCE-5-COLL: Unit 0, excessive collisions. TDR=2
Jul 16 10:02:23 cisco1 177: %LANCE-5-COLL: Unit 0, excessive collisions. TDR=1
Jul 16 10:02:31 cisco1 178: %LANCE-5-COLL: Unit 0, excessive collisions. TDR=0
Jul 16 10:02:39 cisco1 179: %LANCE-5-COLL: Unit 0, excessive collisions. TDR=2
Jul 16 10:02:56 cisco1 180: %LANCE-5-COLL: Unit 0, excessive collisions. TDR=1
At 04:38 PM 7/16/97 -0400, Krzysztof Adamski wrote:
>On Wed, 16 Jul 1997, Kyle Platts wrote:
>[snip]
>>
>> >Here is the exact config of the Adtran:
>> ===============================================================
>> 1) NI 1)Format:ESF
>> 2)Code:B8ZS
>> 3)YEL ALRM:ENA
>> 4)XMIT PRM:OFF
>> 5)CLOCK SOURCE:INTERNAL --> changed to NETWORK
>> 6)BIT STUFFING:DISA
>> 7)SET LBO:0.0
>>
>> I would change the line build out (LBO) to auto. This makes the CSU
send out a signal that is the same strength as what is being received and
helps to eliminate cross talk on the span.
>
>A comment on the LBO auto, when we got our first Adtran it didn't work.
>Adtran told us that we were to close to the smartjack and we needed to
>switch the LBO to 0.0. This has worked without any errors for the last two
>years.
>
>Krzysztof
>
>
Integrated Network Solutions Corp. www.insc.net
305.436.0910 admin@insc.net Serving South Florida