Re: BGP (fwd)

Robert Hanson (roberth@cet.com)
Thu, 10 Jul 1997 16:45:29 -0700 (PDT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: MegaZone: "multilink between cisco and irx (fwd)"
Previous message: Helio Coelho Jr.: "multilink between cisco and irx"
In reply to: MegaZone: "Re: BGP (fwd)"
Next in thread: Stephen Fisher: "Re: multilink between cisco and irx"

and until a solution is provided that allows one to know how hard their
irx is being pounded with 2 full ds1's running bgp, many irx's will be
used as low load non mission critical routers or as doorstops...

-rh

On Thu, 10 Jul 1997, MegaZone wrote:

> I've explained many times now why CPU monitoring on Livingston units is
> absolutely meaningless. The kernel design is not suited to monitoring.
> I strongly doubt we will rewrite ComOS just to allow CPU monitoring since
> it would be a major, low-level rewrite.
>
> -MZ
> --

Next message: MegaZone: "multilink between cisco and irx (fwd)"
Previous message: Helio Coelho Jr.: "multilink between cisco and irx"
In reply to: MegaZone: "Re: BGP (fwd)"
Next in thread: Stephen Fisher: "Re: multilink between cisco and irx"