Re: IRX-111 w/16 Meg For Sale

Tom Samplonius (tom@sdf.com)
Thu, 10 Jul 1997 14:32:24 -0700 (PDT)

On Thu, 10 Jul 1997, Patrick Greenwell wrote:

> An IRX doesn't *need* the 16 megs of memory to do the same job as a Cisco
> with 2 MB. He says it *has* it. You will find that Cisco is in fact much
> more memory hungry than Livingston products.

Yes, Cisco's are memory hungry, mainly due to a large feature list.

> /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
> Patrick Greenwell (510) 934-2153 voice
> Network Administrator (510) 906-1173 fax
> European Telecom
> \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
>

Tom