Re: 56K upgrades <again>

Stephen Fisher (lithium@cia-g.com)
Thu, 3 Jul 1997 14:55:44 -0600 (MDT)

I prefer Livingston's as well.

A good reference is an article in PC Week entitled "Ascend's 56K modem
plans for RASes hit some snags" which is available online at:

http://www8.zdnet.com/pcweek/news/0623/25eras.html

On Thu, 3 Jul 1997, Steven P. Crain wrote:

> On Tue, 17 Jun 1997, Adam Wills (Global 2000) wrote:
>
> > Not that I have a pm3 here (we use USR for X2, and pm2's for all our 33.6
> > older dial-ins), but doesnt ascend already ship 56kFlex modems (i.e. they
> > already have the interoperability figured out and done?). If so,
>
> Big leap to an unfounded conclusion. Ascend's goal is to get possibly
> useful equipment into your hands ASAP. Interoperability is then worked
> on gradually until it is finished. That is a different style of
> marketing. (We happen to prefer Livingston's style.)