Re: Routing dialup addresses that don't share subnet

Stephen Fisher (lithium@cia-g.com)
Sat, 19 Apr 1997 01:08:29 -0600 (MDT)

The best thing is to use OSPF :-)

Right now I'm doing OSPF between my routers, terminal servers, and Unix
servers (running gated). Each portmaster broadcasts its assigned pool to
the other boxes and then if a static ip user gets on it broadcasts that
also.

The portmasters then know the quickest path to send information between
users on different portmasters, the quickest way to get to/from the
portmasters to the servers, etc. I have a simple setup of GateD on my
servers which just sits there listening to the OSPF traffic.

I can give you (or anyone else) configuration details/assistance if wanted
:-)

(I'm running Cisco routers, Livingston PM2 and PM3 terminal servers, and
BSD/OS servers).

On 18 Apr 1997, Ed Donovan wrote:

> How do you setup a PM (2E-30's in our case, ComOS 3.5) with assigned
> addresses in different subnet than its ethernet port? I understand this
> can be done but have not been able to route it successfully. (The other
> important nodes on the network are Linux servers, Cisco 2500's, and a
> few Ascend ISDN routers. A configuration without OSPF is preferred.)
>
> And, parallel question, how can a Framed-Address dialup be configured to
> route properly if it dials in to a PM with an ethernet address and
> assigned pool that don't share its subnet?