> >From the ISP's perspective what's the practical difference between using
> PRI and CT1? It seems that ultimately CT1 will allow 24 B's and is
> certainly cheaper (and more widely available). I'm aware that the CT1
> code is in beta. But this question is really not Livingston-specific.
> (So why am I posting it here? Because its at least highly
> Livingston-relevant.)
1) PRI is not more expensive than CT1 depending on location... which is
why we went with PRI, it also is cheaper for us as compared to POTS..
2) PRI is an ISDN line, so you have no worries about 56K connects, well
almost no worries... ;)
-- Aloha,Sherwood