We were so impressed with it we bought one for ourselves last week with
2 PRI and 4 10 port DSP cards and as soon as testing is finished (the
PRI's were commissioned today) we will be putting it in service probably
on Monday.
Having mainly used Telebit Netblazers (including Mica) and various other
modem servers, we were amazed how easy it was to set up the PM3 and how
reliable it is both for analogue and digital calls.
It also means that without the Netblazer, MTA-32 and Multitech modem
rack, our comms room won't get so warm anymore (PM3's run cold !)
WELL DONE LIVINGSTON !!!!!
Cheers
Phil Taylor
phil@lansystems.co.uk
> ----------
> From: Scott Lagos[SMTP:slagos@net1plus.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 1997 3:46 AM
> To: portmaster-users@livingston.com
> Subject: Need Reassurance on PM3
>
> We waiting on line provisioning from our Telco for numerous CT1 and
> PRI for
> PM3's. The activity concerning PM3 problems on this list in the few
> past
> days have caused me to re-think my decision to go with this product.
>
> I know there must be many ISPs running these with no problems, but of
> course we don't hear from too many of them on this list. If there are
> any
> users of these units having few or no problems please respond, in any
> manner you see reasonable, letting me know of your success. No need
> for
> people having problems to respond, I can see all of them clearly here.
> I
> am looking for information that will re-establish my confidence in the
> PM3.
>
> I am specifically interested in how 28.8k-33.6k calls are being
> handled as
> well as 64K ISDN.
>
> I'll accept any words of encouragement from Livingston directly too,
> but
> please no marketing and sales propaganda. I'm more interested in
> hearing
> on how Livingston is addressing the issues brought to our/their
> attention
> on this list.
>
> I have been and will continue to be a loyal Livingston customer as
> long as
> it makes good business sense to be just that.
>
> Thank you all for your time.
>
> Scott
>