> On Tue, 8 Apr 1997, Stephen Fisher wrote:
>
> > Livingston PortMaster PM-2e ComOS 3.5
>
> He said R.
It is an R, Livingston's hardware detection routines are a little messed
up. I have a PM2eR/30 (W1 not in use) that says PM-2e, a PM2e/20 that
says PM-2e, and a PM2eR/10 (W1 in use) that says PM-2.
> Perhaps there IS a problem that is not widely recognized as I dont think
> there are as many R's as 2e's.
Could be, I haven't been able to keep my PM2eR with W1 port in use up
becuase of the W1 sync. port bug in 3.5 which I installed a few new
ComOS's for - it's fixed now with a beta version.
- Steve
- Systems Manager
- Community Internet Access, Inc.
- Gallup and Grants, New Mexico