Re: Pipeline problem is resolved (fwd)

Kevin Smith (kevin@ascend.com)
Fri, 04 Apr 1997 11:20:26 -0800

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Joe Portman: "Re: Well, got my first PM3 :-) (fwd)"
Previous message: Kevin Smith: "Re: Well, got my first PM3 :-) (fwd)"
In reply to: Howard Leadmon: "Re: Pipeline problem is resolved (fwd)"
Next in thread: Jake: "Re: Pipeline problem is resolved (fwd)"

At 12:27 AM 4/4/97 -0500, you wrote:
>
>> >On a side note I though Livingston was going to support BACP, guess that
>> >must have fallen by the wayside as I know telling the P75 to use BACP
>> >dosen't work with the PM3..
>>
>> We were/are considering it. But it has been in extremely low demand, so
>> it never gets scheduled.
>
>
>Well since Ascend now supports it, and as much as you probably hate to
>admit it, there are a LOT of Pipelines floating around. So since I know
>you have no intention of supporting MP+, supporting BACP would let the
>Pipeline and the PMx interoperate much better. I would sure love to see
>it so there is one vote.. :)

Also look at the list of vendors besides Ascend/Cisco that do support BACP,
there *are* plenty of boxes out there to work with....

Kevin Smith Updated Service and Support
Senior Technical Support Engineer Resources are now at:
Customer Satisfaction
Ascend Communications http://www.ascend.com/service

Next message: Joe Portman: "Re: Well, got my first PM3 :-) (fwd)"
Previous message: Kevin Smith: "Re: Well, got my first PM3 :-) (fwd)"
In reply to: Howard Leadmon: "Re: Pipeline problem is resolved (fwd)"
Next in thread: Jake: "Re: Pipeline problem is resolved (fwd)"