> Once upon a time Mr. Angel Melendez shaped the electrons to say...
> >I'm sorry. I though that might have sounded ambiguous. What I mean is
> >you couldn't assign an IP address to the Ether0 and then two seperate
> >class c domains (outside where ether0 lives) to two async ports
> >(respectively) and end up with a
> >three-way homed router. (Would be nice though). I wasn't referring to
> >the subnetting facilities of the PM routers.
>
> This doesn't sound right - you certainly can route more than one class C
> through a PortMaster. It is not unusual at all to have the the ether on
> one Class C, the serial ports on the subnet of another, and one port routing
> one ore more networks to a dedicated customer.
>
> What you cannot do is have the ether0 port sit on more than one network.
>
How about more than one subnet on W1 port of PM 2ER ?
Eddie