> The slick way to do this is to subnet your network into /27 blocks (8
> subnets with netmask 255.255.255.224) and if you use the first subnet
> (A.B.C.0) for the Ethernet, all the PM's will recognize that the network is
> subnetted & behave nicely. There are 30 usable host addresses per subnet
> which meshes rather nicely with 30-port boxes. Set the first PM up with an
> assigned address of A.B.C.33 and the second with A.B.C.65 etcetera, you will
> only get one subnet route per PM and not 30 host routes.
This might be what my problem is and fix-it.
Here is what I am doing.
I have 3 pm2ers and one class c, they are all at remote locations. So, I
at first subnetted them to a 64 block, x.x.x.192 but was having problems
If I set up the first one, with the first block, it would be
x.x.x.0 x.x.x.63
which I would than put the first one, x.x.x.1 as the ethernet port and
x.x.x.2 as the assigned.
Than, I had my second location, on another Frame-Relay DLCI and put it as
x.x.x.64 x.x.x.127 Broadcast 127
with x.x.x.65 as the ethernet and x.x.x.66 as assigned. But, now here is
the But, routing went to hell. For some reason, it does not like it. It
could not tell where to send all the traffic.
so here is the question, and I see from the post above it might work.
I would break it down to a 32 subnet
but can I use this over Frame-relay??
I would assign each ethernet from the first 32
location 1 206.29.220.1 255.255.255.224 ether0
206.29.220.33 255.255.255.224 assigned
location 2 206.29.220.2 255.255.255.224 ether0
206.29.220.65 255.255.255.224 assigned
location 3 206.29.220.3 255.255.255.224 ether0
206.29.220.97 255.255.255.224 assigned
-----------------
|Cisco 2501 |
-----------------
|T1
| /------------- Location 1 pm2er
/-----\/
|FRAME|--------------- Location 2 pm2er
\-----/\
\------------- Location 3 pm2er
Christian Nielsen cnielsen@vii.com,CN46,KB7HAP
Vyzynz International Inc.
Phone 801-568-0999 Fax 801-568-0953 PS :)