Re: Radius For Nt... why not use a Linux box?
Paul LaZar (paul@paltech.com)
Fri, 3 Nov 1995 08:57:11 -0500
At 01:55 AM 11/3/95 -0500, you wrote:
>>>Here's my scream for a port to NT.
>
>At 01:02 AM 11/3/95 UNDEFINED, Dan Graupman wrote:
>
>>As an interim solution couldn't you just put together a cheap 386 system
>>running Linux to handle RADIUS?
>
>Sure, but in that case couldn't a UnixWare user just put together a BSD box,
>or a VAX user just throw together a little HP/UX machine? or maybe a SCO
>machine... you see what I mean. We want an elegant solution. I don't like
>basing my livelihood on a "cheap 386 system" I would rather run RADIUS on 2
>fault tolerant NT machines which have been running w/o ANY problems since
>March w/ zero downtime. I can manage _everything_ from anywhere in the world
>quickly and easily. I can hire people that simply know how to operate
>Windows and easily show them how to add users, add rights, setup a virtual
>web server, etc... You simply can't have a novice do high level
>administration on UNIX... (please no flames!) I want a reliable, scalable,
>multi-processor, fault tolerant, secure OS and NT fits the bill perfectly.
>
Hear, Hear....
I totally agree and add my name to the NT port list.
Our NT server just don't go down, unlike various *nix boxes we must maintain.
Paul LaZar PAL Technology Group, Inc
paul@paltech.com
(VOX) 301-681-0123 http://www.paltech.com
(FAX) 301-681-4807